Skip to main content
1-877-JOE-WINS
877-563-9467
Success is No Accident

4.9 rating from 709 reviews

The Old Rule That Still Bars Recovery

Many people assume that being mostly right is enough to win an injury claim. In Virginia, that assumption can be wrong. A rule that dates back generations still shapes how these claims are valued, argued, and sometimes lost.

Contributory Negligence Makes Small Mistakes Costly

Virginia is a contributory negligence jurisdiction, which means an injured person who is found even slightly at fault can be barred from recovering. That is a harsher approach than one that simply reduces an award by the injured person’s share of blame, and it changes how adjusters handle every file.

For a pedestrian crossing outside a crosswalk or a driver who braked late, the argument writes itself. The insurer needn’t prove the other driver was blameless, only that the injured person did something that contributed to the crash. Even a disputed detail, such as whether a turn signal was on or how quickly someone stepped off a curb, can become the fact the insurer relies on. Those details are easy to lose and hard to reconstruct later.

Insurers Search for Any Share of Blame

Adjusters have every reason to find a way, however small, to say the injured person shares responsibility. A recorded statement given too early can supply it. A casual remark such as “I didn’t see the car coming” may be repeated back later as an admission of inattention.

Drivers in Reston deal with commuter traffic and shared spaces where cars, cyclists, and pedestrians meet. That mix gives an insurer many chances to argue that someone wasn’t paying attention, which is why Reston car accident attorneys pay close attention to the first statements a client gives.

The same worry applies to people on foot, where pedestrian contributory negligence arguments tend to focus on crosswalks, signals, and distraction. A pedestrian who crosses mid-block or against a signal can expect the insurer to raise it right away.

Seat Belt Use Is Treated Differently in Virginia

One topic that does not work as a blame argument is seat belt use. Under Va. Code 46.2-1094, a seat belt violation does not constitute negligence, may not be considered in mitigation of damages, and is not admissible in evidence in an action for damages arising from the operation of a motor vehicle.

Put simply, an insurer can’t use a skipped seat belt to shrink an award. That protection is narrow, though. It addresses seat belts, not speed, following distance, or a phone in the driver’s hand, and an insurer may still raise those facts in a contributory negligence argument.

Evidence Counters a Blame Argument

A claim that holds up under pressure needs facts that show how the crash happened. The most useful items are:

  • Photos of the vehicles, skid marks, signals, and lane markings
  • Footage from traffic, business, or dash cameras
  • Names and details for independent witnesses
  • The police report and any citation issued to the other driver
  • Medical records from the first visit forward, which tie the injuries to the crash rather than to an earlier condition

Time works against injured people here, since footage gets overwritten and witnesses move on. Sending preservation letters to businesses and agencies before the material is gone is something a Reston personal injury lawyer can do quickly.

Different Collisions Raise Different Blame Questions

A rear-end crash on a busy road, a merging accident near I-66, and a collision with a motorcycle each raise their own arguments. In motorcycle cases, Reston motorcycle accident lawyers often have to answer assumptions about speed and riding style.

Crashes along I-66 and nearby roads involve several lanes, ramps, and vehicles, which can make it harder to say who did what. The same rule applies in each case, and the question is always whether the injured person did something that contributed.

Joe Blaszkow, the managing attorney at Blaszkow Legal, PLLC, is a member of the Virginia Trial Lawyers Association and the American Association for Justice. We’ve handled injury cases for 43 years.

Because one disputed fact can decide a Virginia claim, the early weeks often matter more than the final settlement talks. Anyone hurt near Reston can reach out to us before giving a statement to an insurer, and we’ll go over how the contributory negligence rule might apply.

Blaszkow Legal, PLLC

Ready To Fight For You

Meet Our Attorneys

Injured In An Accident?

Tell Us What Happened

Available 24/7 | Call 877-563-9467